![Jonathan Cooper on Twitter: "TIL the SNES had a lower screen resolution than the NES (256x224 vs 256x240 respectively). Could you imagine the Digital Foundry video on that one! (Image credit: @BJGpixel) Jonathan Cooper on Twitter: "TIL the SNES had a lower screen resolution than the NES (256x224 vs 256x240 respectively). Could you imagine the Digital Foundry video on that one! (Image credit: @BJGpixel)](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EU-i4IzXsAYVtiR.png)
Jonathan Cooper on Twitter: "TIL the SNES had a lower screen resolution than the NES (256x224 vs 256x240 respectively). Could you imagine the Digital Foundry video on that one! (Image credit: @BJGpixel)
![Jonathan Cooper on Twitter: "TIL the SNES had a lower screen resolution than the NES (256x224 vs 256x240 respectively). Could you imagine the Digital Foundry video on that one! (Image credit: @BJGpixel) Jonathan Cooper on Twitter: "TIL the SNES had a lower screen resolution than the NES (256x224 vs 256x240 respectively). Could you imagine the Digital Foundry video on that one! (Image credit: @BJGpixel)](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EU-GfDqUYAUCgaA.jpg:large)
Jonathan Cooper on Twitter: "TIL the SNES had a lower screen resolution than the NES (256x224 vs 256x240 respectively). Could you imagine the Digital Foundry video on that one! (Image credit: @BJGpixel)
![Vitor Vilela on Twitter: "I'm actually curious... which one you actually prefer? 8:7 like how most of the emulators do or 4:3 like how the CRT/NTSC signal does? https://t.co/Yj0g1PpVZ4" / Twitter Vitor Vilela on Twitter: "I'm actually curious... which one you actually prefer? 8:7 like how most of the emulators do or 4:3 like how the CRT/NTSC signal does? https://t.co/Yj0g1PpVZ4" / Twitter](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E6d75KsXsAAUx4Q.jpg)